|
Page 9 of 11 

Gaming Benchmarks (Cont.) Let's continue with the next games we have selected, being X³: Reunion and Quake 4. Both games which are very popular amongst gamers and that will give a good idea on the performance delivered by the Jetway Radeon HD 2900 XT graphics accelerator. Again we have one game using the DirectX and the other using the OpenGL technology. This has some impact on the performance and gaming experience with these games. The goal of each technology is to provide stunning gaming experience with awesome looking visual graphics and physics. So, load em up, and start your 3D engines...
Raven Software Quake 4 
As we want to have a good mix of games, we just had to give Quake 4 a spot in the gaming analysis. Quake 4 is based upon id Software's revolutionary Doom 3 technology. Furthermore, Quake 4 wasn't actually developed by id Software internally; it instead outsourced game development to the capable minds at Raven Software, who have turned in a fantastic looking game with a great single-player campaign. The multiplayer function, however, is underwhelming. Quake was among the first PC shooters to let you take your multiplayer matches onto the Internet, and over the years, the series has become synonymous with great technology and exciting multiplayer. | Gaming Results - 1280x1024 - E6300 2.80GHz - 2GB RAM | | GeForce 8800 GTS | Radeon HD 2900 XT | | No AA/-- AF | 188.8 fps | 160.1 fps | | 2x AA/-- AF | 166.7 fps | 152.2 fps | | 4x AA/-- AF | 142.1 fps | 141.5 fps | | 8x AA/-- AF | 98.9 fps | 117.7 fps | | Results Interpretation: Higher index values are better. | |
| Gaming Results - 1600x1200 - E6300 2.80GHz - 2GB RAM | | GeForce 8800 GTS | Radeon HD 2900 XT | | No AA/-- AF | 172.9 fps | 156.1 fps | | 2x AA/-- AF | 137.2 fps | 141.3 fps | | 4x AA/-- AF | 114.1 fps | 129.0 fps | | 8x AA/-- AF | 69.6 fps | 93.9 fps | | Results Interpretation: Higher index values are better. |
When looking at the Quake 4 gaming results we can see that these follow the same logic as we have encountered with Doom 3. Since both games are using the same 3D engine developed by id Software it doesn't come as a surprise. Both games use the OpenGL technology to bring the action alive. The frame rates are showing the same trend between both cards, but clearly showing the Radeon HD 2900 XT accelerator as being superior. Once we up the stakes by enabling the anti-aliasing feature, the Jetway Radeon HD 2900 XT comes even more forward as the winner and able to deliver smoother game play and sharper visual sceneries. | Gaming Results - 2560x1600 - E6300 2.80GHz - 2GB RAM | | GeForce 8800 GTS | Radeon HD 2900 XT | | No AA/-- AF | 99.9 fps | 124.6 fps | | 2x AA/-- AF | 71.7 fps | 95.9 fps | | 4x AA/-- AF | 51.8 fps | 79.1 fps | | 8x AA/-- AF | 25.1 fps | 46.5 fps | | Results Interpretation: Higher index values are better. |
Looking upon the figures with the widescreen HD resolution, we can draw the same conclusion. Again the stunning game play keeps amazing us, and with that said Quake 4 looks impressive with the Radeon HD 2900 XT accelerator provided by Jetway. The GeForce 8800 GTS doesn't do bad at all, but is just behind in terms of frame rates reported. What should also be said is that the GTX is faster, and does do better than the Radeon HD 2900 XT graphics card. If you are a looking for the best visual quality available today, and you are into the HD gaming then you just have to set your mind which ever of the two. Indeed on this aspect we can't really pin point a winner they both have excellent visual quality.
EgoSoft X³: Reunion 
Following up on our gaming overview, we use one of the newer games which goes by the name, X³: Reunion. This is a sequel to the award winning X²: The Threat game. Quite some extensive development has gone into the X³ engine, making use of DirectX 9.0 technology, to create dramatic visual effects and stunningly realistic starships. Coupled with the massively enhanced artificial life system, X³: Reunion will present players with an ever changing, evolving universe; where a player's action really can shape the future of the universe. Newcomers will enjoy the additions to the already graphically impressive, almost living X³ Universe, while veterans can expect new construction options and an improved physics model. | Gaming Results - 1280x1024 - E6300 2.80GHz - 2GB RAM | | GeForce 8800 GTS | Radeon HD 2900 XT | | No AA/No AF | 81.157 fps | 104.515 fps | | 2x AA/4x AF | 76.294 fps | 84.435 fps | | 4x AA/8x AF | 73.335 fps | 76.568 fps | | 8x AA/16x AF | 69.520 fps | 65.361 fps | | Results Interpretation: Higher index values are better. | |
| Gaming Results - 1600x1200 - E6300 2.80GHz - 2GB RAM | | GeForce 8800 GTS | Radeon HD 2900 XT | | No AA/No AF | 75.196 fps | 97.471 fps | | 2x AA/4x AF | 65.214 fps | 70.025 fps | | 4x AA/8x AF | 61.087 fps | 62.925 fps | | 8x AA/16x AF | 55.771 fps | 53.287 fps | | Results Interpretation: Higher index values are better. |
Looking at the X3: Reunion game, the results are in favor of the Radeon HD 2900 XT config featuring the Jetway video card. The GeForce 8800 GTS shows to be in second position and marks lower frame rate scores consistently. When we go enabling the anti-aliasing functionality, the scores are dropping for both graphics card, with the GeForce 8800 GTS dropping less fast. The Radeon HD 2900 XT edition accelerator shows its real potential by showing stunning game play results and performance figures. If we look at the technology behind the game, namely a 3D engine based upon the DirectX 9.0 specifications it is clear that the Radeon HD 2900 XT setup takes the lead on this one to a certain extend as it features more processing logic in the form of stream processors and a higher clock speed. | Gaming Results - 2560x1600 - E6300 2.80GHz - 2GB RAM | | GeForce 8800 GTS | Radeon HD 2900 XT | | No AA/No AF | 50.265 fps | 66.384 fps | | 2x AA/4x AF | 40.546 fps | 41.542 fps | | 4x AA/8x AF | 38.478 fps | 38.599 fps | | 8x AA/16x AF | 30.323 fps | 29.543 fps | | Results Interpretation: Higher index values are better. |
Also when looking at the HD gaming score, a similar conclusion can be drawn. The GeForce 8800 GTS doesn't do badly at all, but when it is put against a Radeon HD 2900 XT edition system it can't keep up. Of course when you would start comparing all the aspects it all comes down on the available vertex and pixel shaders. And at this point the R600 power comes out on top as it features more raster operation units to get the job done. Of course the GeForce 8800 GTS is penalized by having less stream processors, although raster operation processing units. The Radeon HD 2900 XT delivers awesome frame rates as a single GPU solution and having great visual image quality. 
|