arrowHome arrow Reviews arrow Jetway Radeon HD 2900 XT 512MB Graphics
MVKTech Home Page
Main Menu
Home
News
Guides
Reviews
Previews
Downloads
Forums
Uploads
Links
Contact Us
SCSI Hard Drives
Latest Downloads
Jul.01
Downloads
EVGA 9600GT (SC) PCIe 512MB - Rev 01
Jun.30
Downloads
Connect3D 4850 PCIe 512MB - Rev 01
Jun.30
Downloads
TpuGPU-Z v0.2.5
Jun.30
Downloads
ATI 4870 PCIe 512MB - Rev 01
Jun.30
Downloads
ASUS 4850 PCIe 512MB - Rev 01
Price Comparison
Comparison shopping
Laptop
Tomtom
Digital Camera
Mobile Phones
Ink cartridges
VOIP
Shopbot NZ
Shopbot ZA
Login Form





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Top Downloads
590835
Downloads
Omega WinXP2k v1.6693
320106
Downloads
Omega WinXP2k v1.4523a
223568
Downloads
nvFlash v5.13
220313
Downloads
NiBiTor v3.2
157617
Downloads
RaBiT v2.2.1
Jetway Radeon HD 2900 XT 512MB Graphics
Written by Mavke   
Friday, 27 July 2007
Page 7 of 11

Jetway Information Co., Ltd.

 

Synthetic Benchmarks (Cont.)

We remain still with the synthetic benchmarking of the Jetway Radeon HD 2900 XT edition graphics card and how it stacks up against our system which features the GeForce 8800 GTS accelerator. We will go through the newest benchmark suite developed by Futuremark. Take into account that currently no DirectX 10 compatible benchmark has been released yet. But these will provide a good indication on the processing value and performance of the Radeon HD 2900 XT, but next to that also on the game play of today's games. Similar to the other benchmarks we will compare both configurations and analyze the differences related to the performance figures. So, read on and find out what it is all about...


Futuremark 3DMark05

Futuremark 3DMark05 - MVKTech 2007

The following version from Futuremark came as 3DMark05, and is best suited for the latest generation of DirectX 9.0 graphics cards. It is the first benchmark to require a DirectX 9.0 compliant hardware with support for Pixel Shaders 2.0 or higher! By combining high quality 3D tests, CPU tests, feature tests, image quality tools, and much more, 3DMark05 is a premium benchmark for evaluating the latest generation of gaming hardware. In fact 3DMark05 is the answer to the continuously growing challenge in benchmarking. Designed for higher image quality and the new processing capabilities, it will show some input and what is possible with compliant hardware.

Benchmark Results - 1280x1024 - E6300 2.80GHz - 2GB RAM
GeForce 8800 GTS 640MB3DMark05 Score
0x AA/Optimal

513/1584MHz (Ref - Single)

14348

4x AA/8x AF

513/1584MHz (Ref - Single)

12117

8x AA/16x AF

513/1584MHz (Ref - Single)

10398

Radeon HD 2900 XT 512MB3DMark05 Score
0x AA/Optimal

742/1658MHz (Ref - Single)

16300

4x AA/8x AF

742/1658MHz (Ref - Single)

12797

8x AA/16x AF

742/1658MHz (Ref - Single)

10141

Results Interpretation: Higher index values are better.
Benchmark Results - 1600x1200 - E6300 2.80GHz - 2GB RAM
GeForce 8800 GTS 640MB3DMark05 Score
0x AA/Optimal

513/1584MHz (Ref - Single)

12952

4x AA/8x AF

513/1584MHz (Ref - Single)

10372

8x AA/16x AF

513/1584MHz (Ref - Single)

8265

Radeon HD 2900 XT 512MB3DMark05 Score
0x AA/Optimal

742/1658MHz (Ref - Single)

15480

4x AA/8x AF

742/1658MHz (Ref - Single)

11113

8x AA/16x AF

742/1658MHz (Ref - Single)

8327

Results Interpretation: Higher index values are better.

We would like to mention that as of Futuremark 3DMark05, the graphics processing capabilities are really making the difference on the benchmarks scores, and the CPU becomes less significant in the overall performance indication. Yes, it is still important but doesn't make or break the final score. The Radeon HD 2900 XT edition shows to be faster in most aspects compared to GeForce 8800 GTS config, and showing the way to higher scores. Of course the Radeon HD 2900 XT has the edge with the higher clock speeds, memory throughput, raw processing and shader power compared to the GeForce 8800 GTS accelerator. Although is it only a minor performance difference, and the GTS can certainly keep the pace.

Benchmark Results - 2560x1600 - E6300 2.80GHz - 2GB RAM
GeForce 8800 GTS 640MB3DMark05 Score
0x AA/Optimal

513/1584MHz (Ref - Single)

9031

4x AA/8x AF

513/1584MHz (Ref - Single)

5968

8x AA/16x AF

513/1584MHz (Ref - Single)

3868

Radeon HD 2900 XT 512MB3DMark05 Score
0x AA/Optimal

742/1658MHz (Ref - Single)

11711

4x AA/8x AF

742/1658MHz (Ref - Single)

6878

8x AA/16x AF

742/1658MHz (Ref - Single)

5013

Results Interpretation: Higher index values are better.

As we started the High Definition gaming discussion, it is only natural to also take that approach when looking at the performance results reported by 3DMark05. Actually there is no real difference as already shown at lower resolutions. It become clear that the Radeon HD 2900 XT does have quite and edge over the GeForce 8800 GTS, and does show clearly when anti-aliasing is tuned up to a maximum. This is exactly the point where the 512-bit memory interface become an important factor, and where the Radeon HD 2900 XT can take the full advantage. With widescreen gaming becoming more popular each day it does show that the Radeon HD 2900 series have set a decent impression on the HD experience. It should be very interesting to see the real DirectX 10 performance using the R600 processing capabilities, together with the Extreme HD stunning visual quality.


Futuremark 3DMark06

Futuremark 3DMark06 - MVKTech 2007

To complete the view and Futuremark performance figures we also run a 3DMark06, which is the worldwide standard in advanced 3D game performance benchmarking. A fundamental tool for every company in the PC industry as well as PC users and gamers, 3DMark06 uses advanced real-time 3D game workloads to measure PC performance using a suite of DirectX 9.0c 3D graphics tests, CPU tests, and 3D feature tests. 3DMark06 tests include all new HDR/SM3.0 graphics tests, SM2.0 graphics tests, AI and physics driven single and multiple cores or processor CPU tests and a collection of comprehensive feature tests to reliably measure next generation gaming performance today.

Benchmark Results - 1280x1024 - E6300 2.80GHz - 2GB RAM
GeForce 8800 GTS 640MB3DMark06 Score
0x AA/Optimal

513/1584MHz (Ref - Single)

9044

4x AA/8x AF

513/1584MHz (Ref - Single)

6977

8x AA/16x AF

513/1584MHz (Ref - Single)

5679

Radeon HD 2900 XT 512MB3DMark06 Score
0x AA/Optimal

742/1658MHz (Ref - Single)

10513

4x AA/8x AF

742/1658MHz (Ref - Single)

7328

8x AA/16x AF

742/1658MHz (Ref - Single)

5856

Results Interpretation: Higher index values are better.
Benchmark Results - 1600x1200 - E6300 2.80GHz - 2GB RAM
GeForce 8800 GTS 640MB3DMark06 Score
0x AA/Optimal

513/1584MHz (Ref - Single)

7901

4x AA/8x AF

513/1584MHz (Ref - Single)

5875

8x AA/16x AF

513/1584MHz (Ref - Single)

4322

Radeon HD 2900 XT 512MB3DMark06 Score
0x AA/Optimal

742/1658MHz (Ref - Single)

9328

4x AA/8x AF

742/1658MHz (Ref - Single)

6260

8x AA/16x AF

742/1658MHz (Ref - Single)

4916

Results Interpretation: Higher index values are better.

Going down the list, we have 3DMark06 which was only released at the beginning of last year. And this is where it all comes down to; as it is more advanced and uses the DirectX 9.0c technology. We can see that the Jetway Radeon HD 2900 XT edition takes the lead and reaches a higher score. The GeForce 8800 GTS setup can't stand the real processing power unleashed by the R600 core, and shows that the unified shader technology is the way forward. Certainly the higher memory bandwidth does make a difference when looking at frame buffering and shader intensive tasks. But in the end the main value driving the performance is the R600 core that lifts the Radeon HD 2900 XT to a higher level. Of course if we go and fetch the GeForce 8800 GTX version, the story would be completely different.

Benchmark Results - 2560x1600 - E6300 2.80GHz - 2GB RAM
GeForce 8800 GTS 640MB3DMark06 Score
0x AA/Optimal

513/1584MHz (Ref - Single)

5439

4x AA/8x AF

513/1584MHz (Ref - Single)

3453

8x AA/16x AF

513/1584MHz (Ref - Single)

2019

Radeon HD 2900 XT 512MB3DMark06 Score
0x AA/Optimal

742/1658MHz (Ref - Single)

6403

4x AA/8x AF

742/1658MHz (Ref - Single)

3902

8x AA/16x AF

742/1658MHz (Ref - Single)

2165

Results Interpretation: Higher index values are better.

Now that we are getting a bit used to the HD resolutions and the Extreme HD experience as NVIDIA likes to call it, we can show that the GeForce 8800 GTS edition does okay, but the Radeon HD 2900 XT have quite an edge over the GTS setup. Yeah we certainly are convinced that the High Definition gaming is one hell of an experience and with the Radeon HD 2900 series it does turn a smile on our faces. The image quality is outstanding, providing stunning image clarity. Extreme HD will immerse you in games like never before, letting you see more of the exciting gaming action. The Radeon HD 2900 XT is doing a great job giving the HD gaming a different view. We are sold for the HD gaming, when will you?

 

Jetway Information Co., Ltd.




Last Updated ( Thursday, 30 August 2007 )
 
SCSI Hard Drives
Compare Prices
Shopbot.ca
LCD TV
GPS
Digital Cameras
Mobile Phones
Laptops
LCD Monitors
MP3 Players
Appliances
New Reviews
Gainward BLISS 9800 GX2 Dual-GPU Version
PowerColor Radeon HD 3650 Xtreme Cooling
Dragon Lasers Hulk Green Laser Technology
Gainward BLISS 8800 GT 1GB Golden Sample
Gainward BLISS 8400 GS 256MB DDR2 Board
New Previews
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 Dual-GPU Version
PowerColor Radeon HD 3850 Xtreme Edition
PowerColor Radeon HD 2600 XT 256MB Card
Support Us
Support MVKTech in making a small donation:
HomeNewsGuidesReviewsPreviewsDownloadsForumsUploadsLinksContact UsTop
© 2008 NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 9600 GT 8800 GTX 8600 GTS ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2 HD 3850 3650 2900 XTX X1950 XT - MVKTech
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.