arrowHome arrow Previews arrow PowerColor Radeon X1950 XTX 512MB HDCP
MVKTech Home Page
Main Menu
Home
News
Guides
Reviews
Previews
Downloads
Forums
Uploads
Links
Contact Us
SCSI Hard Drives
Latest Downloads
Jul.01
Downloads
EVGA 9600GT (SC) PCIe 512MB - Rev 01
Jun.30
Downloads
Connect3D 4850 PCIe 512MB - Rev 01
Jun.30
Downloads
TpuGPU-Z v0.2.5
Jun.30
Downloads
ATI 4870 PCIe 512MB - Rev 01
Jun.30
Downloads
ASUS 4850 PCIe 512MB - Rev 01
Price Comparison
Comparison shopping
Laptop
Tomtom
Digital Camera
Mobile Phones
Ink cartridges
VOIP
Shopbot NZ
Shopbot ZA
Login Form





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Top Downloads
590961
Downloads
Omega WinXP2k v1.6693
320300
Downloads
Omega WinXP2k v1.4523a
223768
Downloads
nvFlash v5.13
220440
Downloads
NiBiTor v3.2
157767
Downloads
RaBiT v2.2.1
PowerColor Radeon X1950 XTX 512MB HDCP
Written by Mavke   
Wednesday, 23 August 2006
Page 6 of 10

PowerColor Corporation

 

Synthetic Benchmarks (Cont.)

Yeah, we figured that the PowerColor Radeon X1950 XTX sample didn't really deserve the CPU it should get to deliver its true power. So after tweaking a bit the system, we overclocked our Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 to 2.56GHz (7 x 366MHz), which is actually a gain of about 700MHz. No overclocking was done with the Radeon X1950 XTX, so we left it at default speeds of 650MHz core and 2GHz memory. This way you can get an idea on the impact of going for a stronger processor and which gain in performance you can expect. Once again we will use the available Futuremark and AquaMark 3 benchmarks suites to record the performance figures.


Futuremark 3DMark03 - MVKTech 2006

Benchmark Results - 1280x1024 - E6300 2.56GHz - 2GB RAM
GeForce 7900 GT 256MB3DMark03 Score
0x AA/Optimal450/1320MHz (Ref - Single)

15049

4x AA/16x AF450/1320MHz (Ref - Single)

8929

Radeon X1950 XTX 512MB3DMark03 Score
0x AA/Optimal650/2000MHz (Ref - Single)

17307

4x AA/16x AF650/2000MHz (Ref - Single)

13014

Having pushed our Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 processor to some higher performance levels, by running at about 2.56GHz we reran our 3DMark03 benchmark to see the impact on the results. Once again the NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GT was used as a reference point towards the performance figures derived from the PowerColor Radeon X1950 XTX graphics card. And now the Radeon X1950 XTX takes the lead and with the extra power of the overclocked Intel Conroe, it has made quite a difference against the initial results. This proves clearly that 3DMark03 is depending on the CPU for getting top notch performance delivered by the graphics accelerator.


Futuremark 3DMark05 - MVKTech 2006

Benchmark Results - 1280x1024 - E6300 2.56GHz - 2GB RAM
GeForce 7900 GT 256MB3DMark05 Score
0x AA/Optimal450/1320MHz (Ref - Single)

7063

4x AA/16x AF450/1320MHz (Ref - Single)

5745

Radeon X1950 XTX 512MB3DMark05 Score
0x AA/Optimal650/2000MHz (Ref - Single)

11356

4x AA/16x AF650/2000MHz (Ref - Single)

9509

Our next run was done using 3DMark05, which is more interesting as it is the first benchmark suite that requires DirectX 9.0 compliant hardware. And what a difference, by having unlocked some extra raw power from the Intel Core 2 Duo processor the Radeon X1950 XTX does show to be the clear winner on this benchmark suite. It leaves the GeForce 7900 GT behind by a big margin and still has some potential to do better. I guess an Intel Core 2 Extreme X6800 would be the way to go, but not all can afford this quit expensive processor.


Futuremark 3DMark06 - MVKTech 2006

Benchmark Results - 1280x1024 - E6300 2.56GHz - 2GB RAM
GeForce 7900 GT 256MB3DMark06 Score
0x AA/Optimal450/1320MHz (Ref - Single)

4300

4x AA/16x AF450/1320MHz (Ref - Single)

N/A

Radeon X1950 XTX 512MB3DMark06 Score
0x AA/Optimal650/2000MHz (Ref - Single)

6225

4x AA/16x AF650/2000MHz (Ref - Single)

5168

Continuing our synthetic analysis, we also ran 3DMark06 once again with the overclocked Intel Conroe at 2.56GHz. No surprises though, the PowerColor Radeon X1950 XTX remains on top and delivers stunning performance figures. The extra processing power coming from the overclocked Core 2 Duo processor is a bit less significant, but it shows still that a high-end graphics card really does need a powerful central processor to deliver the performance it was meant for. Again the GeForce 7900 GT does well, but isn't a match for the Radeon X1950 XTX graphics accelerator.


AquaMark3 - MVKTech 2006

Benchmark Results - 1280x1024 - E6300 2.56GHz - 2GB RAM
GeForce 7900 GT 256MBAquaMark3 Score
0x AA/4x AF450/1320MHz (Ref - Single)

101445

4x AA/16x AF450/1320MHz (Ref - Single)

78911

Radeon X1950 XTX 512MBAquaMark3 Score
0x AA/4x AF650/2000MHz (Ref - Single)

108058

4x AA/16x AF650/2000MHz (Ref - Single)

96845

And finally we have gotten the AquaMark 3 updated performance figures. This time the GeForce 7900 GT has to recognize that it is no longer the faster card. With the overclocked Intel Conroe running at 2.56GHz delivering a greater processing throughput towards the video card, it becomes clear that the Radeon X1950 XTX is the way to go. The GeForce 7900 GT might have reached its limits which can't be said about the Radeon X1950 XTX graphics card. Clearly the Radeon X1950 XTX has more processing potential left within its reach...

 

PowerColor Corporation




Last Updated ( Wednesday, 05 September 2007 )
 
Hard Drive Disk Trays Caddies
Compare Prices
Shopbot.ca
LCD TV
GPS
Digital Cameras
Mobile Phones
Laptops
LCD Monitors
MP3 Players
Appliances
New Reviews
Gainward BLISS 9800 GX2 Dual-GPU Version
PowerColor Radeon HD 3650 Xtreme Cooling
Dragon Lasers Hulk Green Laser Technology
Gainward BLISS 8800 GT 1GB Golden Sample
Gainward BLISS 8400 GS 256MB DDR2 Board
New Previews
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 Dual-GPU Version
PowerColor Radeon HD 3850 Xtreme Edition
PowerColor Radeon HD 2600 XT 256MB Card
Support Us
Support MVKTech in making a small donation:
HomeNewsGuidesReviewsPreviewsDownloadsForumsUploadsLinksContact UsTop
© 2008 NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 9600 GT 8800 GTX 8600 GTS ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2 HD 3850 3650 2900 XTX X1950 XT - MVKTech
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.