arrowHome arrow Reviews arrow XGI Volari™ V8
MVKTech Home Page
Main Menu
Home
News
Guides
Reviews
Previews
Downloads
Forums
Uploads
Links
Contact Us
Comcast cable deals
Computer Repairs
Computer Services
Computer Monitor
Price Comparison
Compare prices Australia
Laptop
Tomtom
Digital Camera
Mobile Phones
Ink cartridges
VOIP
Compare prices NZ
Compare prices ZA
Latest Version
Jul.19
Downloads
FileNiBiTor v6.03
Latest Downloads
Jul.19
Downloads
FileNiBiTor v6.03
Jun.27
Downloads
FilePLT GTX570 (SP) PCIe 1280MB - Rev 02
Jun.27
Downloads
FilePLT GTX580 (DF) PCIe 3072MB - Rev 01
Jun.27
Downloads
FilePLT GTX560 (DF) PCIe 2048MB - Rev 01
Jun.27
Downloads
FilePLT GTX55T (DF) PCIe 1024MB - Rev 01
Login Form





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
XGI Volari™ V8
Written by fury   
Tuesday, 14 June 2005

 

Benchmarking:

We are going to test both Windows and D3D environments for a period of time and get an average ever day feel for the performance and capabilities of the Volari V8. For stress testing purposes we are going to use driver version 1.08 WHQL with an over-clock on the engine and memory timings which will be set at 300MHz - 320MHz respectively.

Let's start with the DirectX9 benchmarks, Aquamark3 can stress any video card out there right now with its complex effects. AquaMark3 is a powerful tool to determine reliable information about the gaming performance of a computer system.

FSB x (14.0)
VPU - RAM Clock
Aquamark 3 Score
200 MHz
300MHz/300MHz
25,242
200 MHz
320MHz/320MHz
26,874

The XGI Volari V8 sets some decent scores in Aquamark3. If we compare these to some of it's competitors then surely the Volari V8 can stand the heat. Though, we saw a few image and texture quality issues with parts of the benchmark. But this is related more to the XGI drivers then to the card itself. Overclocking the card gave us a nice performance increase, which certainly proves the card responds well to the increase in clock timings.


The next benchmark we ran, is the popular suite from Futuremark. We ran the 2 latest version of 3DMark, namely 3DMark03 and 3DMark05. Where 3DMark03 is clearly a more DirectX8/DirectX9 combined benchmark suite, 3DMark05 is only featuring DirectX9 algorithms.

FSB x (14.0)
VPU - RAM Clock
3DMark03 Score
200 MHz
300MHz/300MHz
2397
200 MHz
320MHz/320MHz
2514

Again the Volari V8 puts down some good numbers in his category. On our Intel based system the Volari V8 did run well throughout the benchmark.


FSB x (14.0)
VPU - RAM Clock
3DMark05 Score
200 MHz
300MHz/300MHz
 669
200 MHz
320MHz/320MHz
 746

So what about 3DMark05? As this is a more intensive benchmark on the graphics card we see that the results have gone down. However this doesn't mean it isn't performing well. But since the focus is on DirectX9, the Volari V8 struggles keeping up the performance. We get similar results from other cards in the same class which lack a bit the full support of DirectX9.

 



 
Compare Prices
Compare prices Canada
LCD TV
GPS
Digital Cameras
Smartphones
Laptops
LCD Monitors
MP3 Players
Appliances

Custom T-Shirts

LCD tvs

Comptoir Hardware

New Reviews
Patriot Xporter Magnum 64GB USB Flash Disk
Gainward GeForce GTX 260 Standard Version
Gainward BLISS 9800 GX2 Dual-GPU Version
PowerColor Radeon HD 3650 Xtreme Cooling
Dragon Lasers Hulk Green Laser Technology
Promotional Items
New Previews
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 Dual-GPU Version
PowerColor Radeon HD 3850 Xtreme Edition
PowerColor Radeon HD 2600 XT 256MB Card
HomeNewsGuidesReviewsPreviewsDownloadsForumsUploadsLinksContact UsTop
Copyright (c) 2009 - All rights reserved Powered by Flexwebhosting