Biche2
User
 Fresh Boarder
| Posts: 6 |   | Karma: 0
|
Re:GeForce GT 555M using GF116 and possible unlock shaders? - 2011/12/15 12:41
Yep, I know that NVIDIA may have disabled at hardware level as I wrote before. And I know to that the GeForce GTX 570 and GeForce GTX 580 use the same chip but it was expected before the realese of the cards that there where no way to update. Now the GeForce GT5 55M, was and is a GF106 card for all notebooks exept for ASUS N55s series. The question is why ASUS has those chips and not Dell or Alienware? The hope is that I suspect NVIDIA to either sale off their stock of GeForce GTX 560M being GF116 chips and/or to enter the ASUS termal spec book with a GeForce GTX 560M.
I explain my point of view, a GeForce GT 555M using GF106 and some even the even worse GF108 are becoming the new GeForce GT 635 or GeForce GT 630 using these GF108 and/or GF106 chipset. Actually the GeForce GT 555M using the GF116 I don't know what they are becoming but they appear also to power the GeForce GT 635. But why would NVIDIA do so, meaning using this chip for several different card? So for me the stock of GeForce GTX 560M whom clearly where not has sold as lower chip, is downgraded to GeForce GT 635M.
And for commercial calendar date could had been released in ASUS notebook first as GeForce GT 555M with the probability of no hardware disable as it's the first one. The second way is the termal and consumption view, the GeForce GT 555M based on GF106 and/or GF108 are known for their important power consumption level. So emputing and underclocking the GF116 offer the same 3D calculation power than a GF106 and/or GF108 but with a lower TDP lower. for that Nvidia won't had put hardware disable , it would be too expensive for ship already cut off.
Could be the a mix of that too...
The ugly:
- Now as you said Nvidia may have work well and the GT635M could be a hardware disable of shader, and the GT555M only the pre-realised of the GT635M for testing and calendar reason.
- Could be defective SM too, that where disable to be sold
Conclusion: Actually, what is the risk of surching some date by comparing Vbios, and even trying it? At worst that failed , can't flash back and send sav prying At worst that failed , i flash back and no more It work ok but artifact: flashback it work ok and we will make 20% (with oc) power on some laptop
For you the only risk is the loss of time,
Sorry 'im at work and few time for odering this msg.
|