arrowHome arrow Forums
MVKTech Home Page
TreatYouGoods
Camera
Video Cameras
Digital Cameras
Main Menu
Home
News
Guides
Reviews
Previews
Downloads
Forums
Uploads
Links
Contact Us
IDE Hard Drives
Latest Downloads
Oct.05
Downloads
PNY 8800GT PCIe 512MB - Rev 04
Oct.05
Downloads
PowerColor 4850 (CS) PCIe 1024MB - Rev 01
Oct.05
Downloads
HIS 4850 PCIe 512MB - Rev 01
Oct.05
Downloads
HIS 4870 PCIe 1024MB - Rev 01
Oct.05
Downloads
VisionTek 4870X2 PCIe 2048MB - Rev 01
Price Comparison
Comparison shopping
Laptop
Tomtom
Digital Camera
Mobile Phones
Ink cartridges
VOIP
Shopbot NZ
Shopbot ZA
Login Form





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Top Downloads
591671
Downloads
Omega WinXP2k v1.6693
320504
Downloads
Omega WinXP2k v1.4523a
227275
Downloads
nvFlash v5.13
222641
Downloads
NiBiTor v3.2
161718
Downloads
RaBiT v2.2.1
MVKTech Support Forums  


Water cooling tubing size and impact on heat transfer... - 2007/08/03 21:01 I've been trying to find a way to show my appreciation for the help I've been receiving from these forums, so I decided to prepare this post hoping to help fellow enthusiasts. Many times people ask why use 1/2" ID tubing for their water cooling system and not use a 3/8" ID tube which is easier to handle and less bulky. Well, apart from the difference in the head losses of the system there is also an impact on the heat load and temperature of the cooling fluid.

Cross-Sectional Tube Difference...
--- 1/2" (13mm) ID Tube
A1 = (π x d^2)/4 = (π x 13^2)/4 = 132.665 mm^2
--- 3/8" (9mm) ID Tube
A2 = (π x d^2)/4 = (π x 9^2)/4 = 63.585 mm^2

Therefore a 1/2" ID tube has twice the cross-sectional area than a 3/8" ID tube. One very important property of a fluid, as heat transfer examination is concerned is its specific heat capacity. Specific heat capacity (c or C) can be described as the measure of the heat energy (Q) needed to increase the temperature of a unit quantity of a fluid by a certain temperature interval.

A larger amount of heat energy is required to increase the temperature of a high specific heat capacity fluid than a low specific heat capacity one. The reason why water cooling is more effective than air cooling is simply because water has a specific heat capacity of 4.18 Joule/gram.°C while air’s specific heat is 1.012 Joule/gram.°C.

Energy Theory Statements...
--- Q = C x m x ΔT
- Q = Heat energy [joules]
- C = Specific heat capacity of fluid [joules/gram.°C]
- m = Fluid mass [grams]

--- ΔT = T2 – T1
T2 = Final fluid temperature [°C]
T1 = Initial fluid temperature [°C]

Simply by replacing and rearranging, this will give the following understandings around the two formulas around the heat dissipation and energy. Just combining both and making the correct relations and equations.
--- Q = C x m(T2 – T1)
--- T2 = (Q/(C x m)) + T1

Let's try with an example... Assume that the total heat output of the water cooled parts of a PC is 500W and a total length of 1.5 metres of tube is used. The initial temperature of the cooling fluid (ionised water) is 20°C. Calculations for both 1/2" and 3/8" tubes are going to be carried so the difference in the final temperature are established.

Calculations Fluid Volume...
--- 1/2" ID Tube Fluid Volume
- V1 = A1 x L = 0.0001989975 m^3

--- 3.8" ID Tube Fluid Volume
V2 = A2 x L = 0.0000953775 m^3

- Q = 500 W
- T1 = 20°C
- L = 1.5 m
- A1 = 132.665 mm^2 = 0.000132665 m^2
- A2 = 63.585 mm^2 = 0.000063585 m^2

Calculation Final Temperatures...
--- 1/2" ID Tube Temperature
- T2 = (500/(4.18 x 198.9975)) + 20
- T2 = 20.6°C

--- 3/8" ID Tube Temperature
- T2 = (500/(4.18 x 95.3775)) + 20
- T2 = 21.25°C

Considering that the specific weight of water is 1000 Kg/m^3:
- m1 = 0.1989975 Kg = 198.9975 grams
- m2 = 0.0953775 Kg = 95.3775 grams

For some this difference might not be that important but I hope I could help those control freaks like me that like do take in consideration everything and achieve the max possible! Thanks a lot for reading...
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Re:Water cooling tubing size and impact on heat transfer... - 2007/08/04 00:39 They all come in different thickness... I use 1/2" ID by 5/8" OD (13mm x 16mm) and I have seen tubing at 1/2" ID by 3/4" OD (13mm x 19 mm)...
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Re:Water cooling tubing size and impact on heat transfer... - 2007/08/04 09:11 Thanks mate, I don't know much about water cooling but it is nice to see some extra information being shared that is very usefull for all visitors who are thinking about going for water cooling. Thanks!
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Re:Water cooling tubing size and impact on heat transfer... - 2007/08/04 11:22 @Raptor
The thickness of the tube is only relevant to the bending abilities and the fittings to be used, i.e. Koolance fittings cannot be used with the 3/4" OD (which I happen to use).

My friend Mavke I will try my best to make time and prepare more posts of this sort so as to help as much as I can. For this one I didn't take into consideration the effect that the tubing inner diameter has on the head loss of the system and therefore the pump selection, so this is going to be the next one.
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
SAS Hard Drives
Compare Prices
Shopbot.ca
LCD TV
GPS
Digital Cameras
Mobile Phones
Laptops
LCD Monitors
MP3 Players
Appliances
New Reviews
Gainward BLISS 9800 GX2 Dual-GPU Version
PowerColor Radeon HD 3650 Xtreme Cooling
Dragon Lasers Hulk Green Laser Technology
Gainward BLISS 8800 GT 1GB Golden Sample
Gainward BLISS 8400 GS 256MB DDR2 Board
New Previews
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 Dual-GPU Version
PowerColor Radeon HD 3850 Xtreme Edition
PowerColor Radeon HD 2600 XT 256MB Card
Support Us
Support MVKTech in making a small donation:
MyPMS Professional
Inbox
You have 0 new message(s).
HomeNewsGuidesReviewsPreviewsDownloadsForumsUploadsLinksContact UsTop
© 2008 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 GTX 260 9800 GX2 9600 GT 8800 GTX ATI Radeon HD 4870 HD 4850 HD 3870 X2 HD 3850 2900 XTX - MVKTech
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.