arrowHome arrow Forums
MVKTech Home Page
TreatYouGoods
Camera
Digital Cameras
Video Cameras
Main Menu
Home
News
Guides
Reviews
Previews
Downloads
Forums
Uploads
Links
Contact Us
Hard Drive Disk Trays Caddies
Latest Downloads
Oct.12
Downloads
EVGA 8800GTS PCIe 512MB - Rev 02
Oct.12
Downloads
EVGA 8800GTS PCIe 512MB - Rev 03
Oct.12
Downloads
EVGA 8800GTS (KO) PCIe 512MB - Rev 01
Oct.12
Downloads
EVGA 8800GTS+ (SS) PCIe 640MB - Rev 01
Oct.12
Downloads
EVGA 8800GTS+ (SS) PCIe 640MB - Rev 02
Price Comparison
Comparison shopping
Laptop
Tomtom
Digital Camera
Mobile Phones
Ink cartridges
VOIP
Shopbot NZ
Shopbot ZA
Login Form





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Top Downloads
591694
Downloads
Omega WinXP2k v1.6693
320516
Downloads
Omega WinXP2k v1.4523a
227494
Downloads
nvFlash v5.13
222807
Downloads
NiBiTor v3.2
161976
Downloads
RaBiT v2.2.1
MVKTech Support Forums  


<< Start < Prev 1 2 Next > End >>
Intel finally set to smash AMD in performance stakes - 2006/03/08 10:23 Hehus managed to get down and dirty with some sweet Conroe love. Yep, you heard it right we have managed to snag some time with the new Intel architecture some 4 months before it is believed to be released. The best part is, we managed to compare it against AMD's highest performing part which was overclocked. Intel is clearly excited about this, and has good reason to be.
Intel finally set to smash AMD in performance stakes
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Re:Intel finally set to smash AMD in performance stakes - 2006/03/08 14:45 Uhm, I won't believe for now that Conroe is much more better than a AMD Athlon FX-60 at 2.8GHz. We don't even know what are the hardware used. And it's new technology vs the new Athlon FX-60, that is kinda the same PCU has an ADM X2 4800+, but at 2.6GHz. Let's see when socket AM2 will show off it's true performance!
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Re:Intel finally set to smash AMD in performance stakes - 2006/03/08 15:01 I reckon Intel will still have the problems due to the aging FSB technology. It already has trouble keeping up with today's single core designs and cramming multiple cores on it will cause more problem. I think AMD's move to DDR2 probably won't show much improvement in performance. The A64's has always liked low timing RAM and DDR2 timing is just too loose. I liked it better when there were rumors of AMD going straight to DDR3.... My 2 cents...
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Re:Intel finally set to smash AMD in performance stakes - 2006/03/08 15:48 Well you can say what you want but the AM2 socket won't give much improvement on the perfomance... And the way the Conroe is designed it is a bigger change then in the paste. And Dual Core will really be dual processing the way it should be so I am saving up for the Conroe as this CPU has more then just plain GHz to beat the AMD processors. And a 2.67GHz Intel CPU beating up a 2.8GHz AMD is really new since a long time where Intel always needed high clocked processors to beat AMD. So I am going for the Conroe!
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Re:Intel finally set to smash AMD in performance stakes - 2006/03/08 17:54 Mavke wrote:
And a 2.67GHz Intel CPU beating up a 2.8GHz AMD is really new since a long time where Intel always needed high clocked processors to beat AMD.
Indeed, you're right....

Well you can say what you want but the AM2 socket won't give much improvement on the perfomance...
Since the memory controller is in the CPU, I think AMD will have a bigger advantage, maybe better timings. Also, HyperTransport will be of 1.2GHz (2.4GHz Effective). By the way, AMD was able to kick Intel butt with DDR. Will it be the same thing now?
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Re:Intel finally set to smash AMD in performance stakes - 2006/03/08 17:55 fnbeans wrote:
I liked it better when there were rumors of AMD going straight to DDR3.
Hehe, that would be a good surprise!
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Re:Intel finally set to smash AMD in performance stakes - 2006/03/09 09:45 ChristTheGreat wrote:
Since the memory controller is in the CPU, I think AMD will have a bigger advantage, maybe better timings. Also, HyperTransport will be of 1.2GHz (2.4GHz Effective). By the way, AMD was able to kick Intel butt with DDR. Will it be the same thing now?
Well that is no change from recent AMD processors as they all have the memory controller on the CPU. And still then the Conroe kicks the Athlon FX-60 in the ass. The AM2 socket doesn't bring much more new things then the current Socket 939 except the support of DDR2. But that won't give that much increase in performance at all. So I am putting my money on Intel this time and even the Athlon FX-62 might get a hard time...
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Re:Intel finally set to smash AMD in performance stakes - 2006/03/09 14:08 And just to point out the difference also check the more detailed performance difference between the Intel Conroe and the AMD Athlon FX-60... And that confirms that Intel is really take a good jump in performance increase as low clock speeds.
Intel Conroe Processor Performance Preview
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Re:Intel finally set to smash AMD in performance stakes - 2006/03/09 14:12 And to add on top there has been a follow up the performance preview covered by AnandTech. This gives even more details on the systems used and so on. And actually the systems had been prepared by Intel but the guys from AnandTech could have a run on these... And they even run their own made demos to check the performance.
Intel Conroe Performance Follow-Up Preview
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Re:Intel finally set to smash AMD in performance stakes - 2006/03/09 15:12 Mavke wrote:
And that confirms that Intel is really take a good jump in performance increase as low clock speeds.
Yes, they finally changed their way. This should have been done a long time ago lol... But for me, I'll wait till AM2. I have an AMD 3200+ doing the job, I'll overclock it to his max clock, then after change my computer (same for my BFG GeForce 6800 GS, it will be unlock). But here's a good thing.

Instead of launching a Socket AM2 in nice, snowy Hannover, the company pushed the launch all the way to beginning of June, when hacks from around the world will gather at Computex in Ole' Taipei. Although almost every motherboard manufacturer exhibiting on SnowBIT is showing a Socket AM2 motherboard, the fact is that the CPUs were not delayed, but the new and improved memory controller is being placed into the marchitecture.
I'll keep my money. Maybe the first CPU will be a little better, but the next will much better...
Did AMD deliberately delay Athlon 64 DDR2?
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
<< Start < Prev 1 2 Next > End >>
Fibre Fiber Channel Hard Drives
Compare Prices
Shopbot.ca
LCD TV
GPS
Digital Cameras
Mobile Phones
Laptops
LCD Monitors
MP3 Players
Appliances
New Reviews
Gainward BLISS 9800 GX2 Dual-GPU Version
PowerColor Radeon HD 3650 Xtreme Cooling
Dragon Lasers Hulk Green Laser Technology
Gainward BLISS 8800 GT 1GB Golden Sample
Gainward BLISS 8400 GS 256MB DDR2 Board
New Previews
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 Dual-GPU Version
PowerColor Radeon HD 3850 Xtreme Edition
PowerColor Radeon HD 2600 XT 256MB Card
Support Us
Support MVKTech in making a small donation:
MyPMS Professional
Inbox
You have 0 new message(s).
HomeNewsGuidesReviewsPreviewsDownloadsForumsUploadsLinksContact UsTop
© 2008 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 GTX 260 9800 GX2 9600 GT 8800 GTX ATI Radeon HD 4870 HD 4850 HD 3870 X2 HD 3850 2900 XTX - MVKTech
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.