Re:Radeon X1800, X1600 & X1300 Performance In 3DMark - MVKTech Support Forums :: mvk.tech :: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 GTX 260 9800 GX2 9600 GT 8800 GTX ATI Radeon HD 4870 HD 4850 HD 3870 X2 HD 3850 2900 XTX

Forums

TreatYouGoods
Camera Digital Cameras Video Cameras

Main Menu

Getprice Comparison
Digital Cameras

Latest Downloads

Nov.30	Galaxy 9800GT PCIe 512MB - Rev 01
Nov.30	XFX 9600GT (X3) PCIe 512MB - Rev 04
Nov.30	XFX GTX260 (BL) PCIe 896MB - Rev 02
Nov.23	ASUS 9800GT+ (MX) PCIe 512MB - Rev 01
Nov.23	Galaxy 8500GT (LP) PCIe 512MB - Rev 01

Price Comparison
Comparison shopping Laptop Tomtom Digital Camera Mobile Phones Ink cartridges VOIP Shopbot NZ Shopbot ZA

Top Downloads

592388	Omega WinXP2k v1.6693
320614	Omega WinXP2k v1.4523a
229470	nvFlash v5.13
224118	NiBiTor v3.2
164146	RaBiT v2.2.1

MVKTech Support Forums

home | post reply | threaded view | help

Boardwalk :: Forum List

ATI Graphics Cards

ATI Radeon Series

Mavke
Admin

Admin

Posts: 14234

Karma: 360

Radeon X1800, X1600 & X1300 Performance In 3DMark - 2005/10/02 15:12 Well the first details arrive on the performance of the new upcoming cards from ATI based upon the R520, RV530 and RV515. And the top performing Radeon X1800 XT should reach about 9100 3DMark05...
Radeon X1800, X1600 & X1300 Performance In 3DMark

| | The administrator has disabled public write access.

ChristTh
User

Platinum Boarder

Posts: 1066

Karma: 18

Re:Radeon X1800, X1600 & X1300 Performance In 3DMark - 2005/10/05 18:49 There's actually the first test about the Radeon X1800 XT and XL...
- XT : 9278 3DMark05
- XL : 7100 3DMark05 (still be lower than GeForce 7800 GTX)

Nice FPS in Battlefield 2, more than the GeForce 7800 GTX. But they don't have any support for OpenGL. In Doom 3, the GeForce 7800 GTX is all the way higher...

For 6 months after the GeForce 7800 GTX, ATI looks good but NVIDIA is already making a 90nm version of GeForce 7800 GTX for the first quarter of 2006.

| | The administrator has disabled public write access.

Mavke
Admin

Admin

Posts: 14234

Karma: 360

Re:Radeon X1800, X1600 & X1300 Performance In 3DMark - 2005/10/05 23:43 ChristTheGreat wrote:
For 6 months after the GeForce 7800 GTX, ATI looks good but NVIDIA is already making a 90nm version of GeForce 7800 GTX for the first quarter of 2006.
Mmmm you say it right looks good...but the Radeon X1800 XT is still a month away or even more before we will be able to really by the cards. So again a delay by ATI. For some reason ATI is still running 6-7 months behind as they are just able to match the GeForce 7800 GTX and not even able to just overtake it...

So I think they have more work to do then just a 700MHz core of the Radeon X1800. Let them get more pipelines then 16 and then we will see a difference. But I think by then NVIDIA will have a small refresh with the 90nm version that will be able to reach as well 500-600MHz or even more. The battle only started and from what I see ATI is behind at the tiebreak. A duece with ATI getting backbut not enough...

| | The administrator has disabled public write access.

ChristTh
User

Platinum Boarder

Posts: 1066

Karma: 18

Re:Radeon X1800, X1600 & X1300 Performance In 3DMark - 2005/10/06 04:15 Mave wrote:
So I think they have more work to do then just a 700MHz core of the Radeon X1800. Let them get more pipelines then 16 and then we will see a
difference.
Right, same for the GeForce 7800 GTX. With 512MB,maybe this could change too. But I still wait to know if there's going to be an Ultra to get almost same performance.

Actually, the Radeon W1800 XT, like you said, will take a month to buy the card, and maybe at a price very high (not sure but I suppose). Those card are the first to be compatible Shader Model 3.0. This is a slap on ATI consumer. To get better performance with HDR, they will need those card, like even if CrossFire would be commercialized, they will have to buy new card.

Thats for some reason I prefer NVIDIA than ATI (and for overclock). By the way, ATI has nice card. Noisy but not bad. They still need to be working harder to be back at 100% in the race.

| | The administrator has disabled public write access.

fnbeans
User

Senior Boarder

Posts: 235

Karma: 2

Re:Radeon X1800, X1600 & X1300 Performance In 3DMark - 2005/10/06 09:58 the 3dmark05 benchmarks seem to be a bit misleading. yes the X1800XT scores about 1500 more points but if u look at this review http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=26720 the 7800gtx can hold its own in many games. ati are probably just optimising drivers for it... not that nvidia dont do it too, its just that ati seems to be doing a better job.

it looks like top dog (for a single graphics card anyways) is going to be the one who can OC more and my money is on the X1800XT

| | The administrator has disabled public write access.

Raptor
User

Platinum Boarder

Posts: 1127

Karma: 27

Re:Radeon X1800, X1600 & X1300 Performance In 3DMark - 2005/10/06 16:48 imo the 1800xt isnt goin to be all that . ati had the crown with there 9600xt/9800xt line up but they fumbled it when it came to the current line up and still cannot keep up . where as Nvidia fumbled their fx series card but recovered quite quickly with the gforce 6 line up . the only way Ati is remotly goin to catch up is that they need somthing more then just Pixel shader 3 ( btw Nvidia had that since gforce 6 , Now Ati says you can now have Pixel shader 3 but you have to wait till november ) HA HA HA boy thats really innovating .......

| | The administrator has disabled public write access.

reaperrr
User

Junior Boarder

Posts: 23

Karma: 0

Re:Radeon X1800, X1600 & X1300 Performance In 3DMark - 2005/10/06 18:06 fnbeans wrote:
the 3dmark05 benchmarks seem to be a bit misleading. yes the X1800XT scores about 1500 more points but if u look at this review http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=26720 the 7800gtx can hold its own in many games. ati are probably just optimising drivers for it... not that nvidia dont do it too, its just that ati seems to be doing a better job.
That's not the reason. The reason is simply that 3dmark05 uses MUCH higher poly-count for the game scenes than even the most up-to-date games, and so the Radeons have an advantage (8 vertex-pipes @ 625 mhz is simply better than 8 vertexpipes @ 470 Mhz).
Has been the same for X800 vs GF6800 too.

| | The administrator has disabled public write access.

Boardwalk :: Forum List ATI Graphics Cards ATI Radeon Series

Joomlaboard Forum Component 1.1.2 Stable
Two Shoes M-Factory

Compare Prices
Shopbot.ca LCD TV GPS Digital Cameras Mobile Phones Laptops LCD Monitors MP3 Players Appliances

Online Casino

New Reviews

	Gainward GeForce GTX 260 Standard Version
	Gainward BLISS 9800 GX2 Dual-GPU Version
	PowerColor Radeon HD 3650 Xtreme Cooling
	Dragon Lasers Hulk Green Laser Technology
	Gainward BLISS 8800 GT 1GB Golden Sample

New Previews

	NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 Dual-GPU Version
	PowerColor Radeon HD 3850 Xtreme Edition
	PowerColor Radeon HD 2600 XT 256MB Card

Support Us

Support MVKTech in making a small donation:

MyPMS Professional

Inbox
	You have 0 new message(s).

Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.