arrowHome arrow Forums
MVKTech Home Page
Main Menu
Home
News
Guides
Reviews
Previews
Downloads
Forums
Uploads
Links
Contact Us
Comcast cable deals
Computer Repairs
Computer Services
Computer Monitor
Price Comparison
Compare prices Australia
Laptop
Tomtom
Digital Camera
Mobile Phones
Ink cartridges
VOIP
Compare prices NZ
Compare prices ZA
Latest Version
Jul.19
Downloads
FileNiBiTor v6.03
Latest Downloads
Jul.19
Downloads
FileNiBiTor v6.03
Jun.27
Downloads
FilePLT GTX570 (SP) PCIe 1280MB - Rev 02
Jun.27
Downloads
FilePLT GTX580 (DF) PCIe 3072MB - Rev 01
Jun.27
Downloads
FilePLT GTX560 (DF) PCIe 2048MB - Rev 01
Jun.27
Downloads
FilePLT GTX55T (DF) PCIe 1024MB - Rev 01
Login Form





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
MVKTech Support Forums  


Water cooling tubing size and impact on heat transfer... - 2007/08/03 21:01 I've been trying to find a way to show my appreciation for the help I've been receiving from these forums, so I decided to prepare this post hoping to help fellow enthusiasts. Many times people ask why use 1/2" ID tubing for their water cooling system and not use a 3/8" ID tube which is easier to handle and less bulky. Well, apart from the difference in the head losses of the system there is also an impact on the heat load and temperature of the cooling fluid.

Cross-Sectional Tube Difference...
--- 1/2" (13mm) ID Tube
A1 = (π x d^2)/4 = (π x 13^2)/4 = 132.665 mm^2
--- 3/8" (9mm) ID Tube
A2 = (π x d^2)/4 = (π x 9^2)/4 = 63.585 mm^2

Therefore a 1/2" ID tube has twice the cross-sectional area than a 3/8" ID tube. One very important property of a fluid, as heat transfer examination is concerned is its specific heat capacity. Specific heat capacity (c or C) can be described as the measure of the heat energy (Q) needed to increase the temperature of a unit quantity of a fluid by a certain temperature interval.

A larger amount of heat energy is required to increase the temperature of a high specific heat capacity fluid than a low specific heat capacity one. The reason why water cooling is more effective than air cooling is simply because water has a specific heat capacity of 4.18 Joule/gram.°C while air’s specific heat is 1.012 Joule/gram.°C.

Energy Theory Statements...
--- Q = C x m x ΔT
- Q = Heat energy [joules]
- C = Specific heat capacity of fluid [joules/gram.°C]
- m = Fluid mass [grams]

--- ΔT = T2 – T1
T2 = Final fluid temperature [°C]
T1 = Initial fluid temperature [°C]

Simply by replacing and rearranging, this will give the following understandings around the two formulas around the heat dissipation and energy. Just combining both and making the correct relations and equations.
--- Q = C x m(T2 – T1)
--- T2 = (Q/(C x m)) + T1

Let's try with an example... Assume that the total heat output of the water cooled parts of a PC is 500W and a total length of 1.5 metres of tube is used. The initial temperature of the cooling fluid (ionised water) is 20°C. Calculations for both 1/2" and 3/8" tubes are going to be carried so the difference in the final temperature are established.

Calculations Fluid Volume...
--- 1/2" ID Tube Fluid Volume
- V1 = A1 x L = 0.0001989975 m^3

--- 3.8" ID Tube Fluid Volume
V2 = A2 x L = 0.0000953775 m^3

- Q = 500 W
- T1 = 20°C
- L = 1.5 m
- A1 = 132.665 mm^2 = 0.000132665 m^2
- A2 = 63.585 mm^2 = 0.000063585 m^2

Calculation Final Temperatures...
--- 1/2" ID Tube Temperature
- T2 = (500/(4.18 x 198.9975)) + 20
- T2 = 20.6°C

--- 3/8" ID Tube Temperature
- T2 = (500/(4.18 x 95.3775)) + 20
- T2 = 21.25°C

Considering that the specific weight of water is 1000 Kg/m^3:
- m1 = 0.1989975 Kg = 198.9975 grams
- m2 = 0.0953775 Kg = 95.3775 grams

For some this difference might not be that important but I hope I could help those control freaks like me that like do take in consideration everything and achieve the max possible! Thanks a lot for reading...
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Re:Water cooling tubing size and impact on heat transfer... - 2007/08/04 00:39 They all come in different thickness... I use 1/2" ID by 5/8" OD (13mm x 16mm) and I have seen tubing at 1/2" ID by 3/4" OD (13mm x 19 mm)...
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Re:Water cooling tubing size and impact on heat transfer... - 2007/08/04 09:11 Thanks mate, I don't know much about water cooling but it is nice to see some extra information being shared that is very usefull for all visitors who are thinking about going for water cooling. Thanks!
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Re:Water cooling tubing size and impact on heat transfer... - 2007/08/04 11:22 @Raptor
The thickness of the tube is only relevant to the bending abilities and the fittings to be used, i.e. Koolance fittings cannot be used with the 3/4" OD (which I happen to use).

My friend Mavke I will try my best to make time and prepare more posts of this sort so as to help as much as I can. For this one I didn't take into consideration the effect that the tubing inner diameter has on the head loss of the system and therefore the pump selection, so this is going to be the next one.
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Compare Prices
Compare prices Canada
LCD TV
GPS
Digital Cameras
Smartphones
Laptops
LCD Monitors
MP3 Players
Appliances

Custom T-Shirts

LCD tvs

Comptoir Hardware

MyPMS Professional
Inbox
You have 0 new message(s).
New Reviews
Patriot Xporter Magnum 64GB USB Flash Disk
Gainward GeForce GTX 260 Standard Version
Gainward BLISS 9800 GX2 Dual-GPU Version
PowerColor Radeon HD 3650 Xtreme Cooling
Dragon Lasers Hulk Green Laser Technology
Promotional Items
New Previews
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 Dual-GPU Version
PowerColor Radeon HD 3850 Xtreme Edition
PowerColor Radeon HD 2600 XT 256MB Card
HomeNewsGuidesReviewsPreviewsDownloadsForumsUploadsLinksContact UsTop
Copyright (c) 2009 - All rights reserved Powered by Flexwebhosting